Thread:Shades of Mundane/@comment-24776570-20160402225356/@comment-24919276-20160405042521

The equation is simple because it is (Inactivity = Item is up for grabs, first come first serve). There is no expectation for the person who lost the item to retrieve it in any fashion within the rule for stripping them for their inactivity.

So people are saying, "Come get it IC if you want it" and they can do that, or they can convince them OOC to give it back or whatever else they want to try and pull off. It doesn't matter because it has nothing to do with them being stripped for their inactivty.

It would be like if we had a bijuu rule that was, "If a host is stripped of their bijuu for inactivity but then returns and challenges for the bijuu they lost, they may skip ahead of all other challengers and attempt to retreive it." Why would we do that? Why would they receive special treatment because they failed to follow an activty rule? That's how I see this anyway.