Board Thread:General Discussion (Wiki)/@comment-5622510-20160307025320/@comment-4698023-20160307050631

SL name: Kayenta Moenkopi

Should Bocchiere be retained or removed: Remove

Reason/Justification:

My vote is based upon the rules about Admin Accountability for the wikia. Jsut take a look and then we will see how many of these things Bocchiere has done.

Accountability
Administrators are accountable for their actions involving administrator tools, and unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors who lack such tools. Subject only to the bounds ofcivility, avoiding personal attacks, and reasonable good faith, editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions. Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed.

Administrators who seriously, or repeatedly, act in a problematic manner or have lost the trust or confidence of the community may be sanctioned or have their access removed. In the past, this has happened or been suggested for: 
 * "Bad faith" adminship (sock puppetry, gross breach of trust,[7]  etc.)
 * Breach of basic policies (attacks, biting/civility, edit warring, privacy, etc.)
 * Conduct elsewhere incompatible with adminship (off-site attacking, etc.).
 * Failure to communicate[6]  – this can be either to users (e.g., lack of suitable warnings or explanations of actions), or to concerns of the community (especially when explanations or other serious comments are sought).
 * Repeated or consistent poor judgment

So My objections:

1] Failure to provide an atmposphere where "editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions." --> Yomi got banned for making an edit, was never talked to about it or had the action explained. Simply was accused of inciting an editing war.

2]  Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed. --> I have yet to see bocchiere respond civily to any instance where his actions are being questioned. Quite the opposite. You have seen it for yourselves. His words are abusive and lean toward personal attacks or just a blatant refusal to be questioned informing us to deal with his decision. End of discussion.

3] SockPuppetry--> look it up. Its making an alt to gain access. Yumei perma banned him from this wikia because of his harassment and abusive behavior. Yet here he is on another account acting in the same manner as before. Only now he is the one in charge.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;">4] Breach of basic policies --> He has breeched them in every way. He has been prone to "<span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;line-height:20px;">attacks, biting/civility, edit warring, privacy" violations.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"><span style="font-weight:normal;color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;">5]  <span style="font-weight:normal;color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;">Conduct elsewhere incompatible with adminship (off-site attacking, etc.) --> Xia tried to post links to the discussion thread on this wikia to SL about removing Bocc as admin. He posted a link in the SL Mission HQ. Then Bocc slams him, trips the langauge sensor in the process, and flips the world the bird. And that is one instance where he violates this rule.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;">6] Failure to communicate--> Yes he fails here as well. He did not notify the numerous people whose claims he removed from the claimed list. Not just the Kiri people. I was shocked to look at it and see how devoid of content it now is. SO much for preserving the history of SL. Current owners could have been added. But no, whole items are now gone forever. and where was the discussion or notification to each individual that this was going to happen? Uhm, no where?

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;">7] <span style="line-height:20px;color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;">Repeated or consistent poor judgment--> Well, I would say this is a big offense. Looking at all the main offenses he has committed, and being able to say he has done each and every one of those, this clearly demonstrates repeated and consistently poor judgement.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"><span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;">8] Abuse of power to benefit himself and his friends--> So, he didn't like the swords being inactive? Why not give them to other Kiri ninja if that was the motivation? No, he claimed them and dealt them out to his friends who also are not Kiri affiliates.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"><span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;">9] And mostly Obstinance--> when he thinks something has to be a certain way, then that is it. For instance. Gitsune was using the swords and keeping them active in actual sparing RP. But he decided that was not real acitivty and was not going to permit that to count. No discussion.

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"><span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:20px;">And then just down right vulgarity. This is not the sort of personalit we need to run this site. And I quote:

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"> http://narutoprofile.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:14228

<p style="margin-bottom:0.1em;"> Do us all a favor, AJ, and choke on my cock the next time you're blowing me.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;line-height:22px;">Love, Your Dom,

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;line-height:22px;margin-bottom:0px!important;">Bocch.