Board Thread:General Discussion (Wiki)/@comment-25567027-20160304224647/@comment-24491919-20160305022434

Good job on bringing up stuff against Bocc that has nothing to do with the Wiki at all. If a guy crashes his truck from being drunk do you bring that up as a plausible argument if a case were held to discuss if he can paint better than than say Vincent van Gogh? No it's dismissible as it holds no weight. The two aren't interchangeable. Those events happened in the past and do not dictate if he can, as per the example, 'paint'. And as far as I can see Yomi still has Admin. I now know that she did get it taken away once due to an 'edit war' with Bocc. You failed to include details which I will glady fill in for you. She has edit rights still. Bocc as far as I know does not have the same level of code finesse and skill as Yomi by any means, but he is active in the SL community and has always been for years.

That's the way I see it. Yomi - Admin can edit code and templates and all of that. Bocc just makes sure the Wiki has an active staff and other things such as correcting unjust edits and locking pages to be kept from being 'edit war' such as the tailed beast page. You went straight into removing Bocc as the keeper of the Wiki out of hate. Not out of his ability to keep the wiki 'updated'. (Which it does by itself. It was without anyone having admin rights to it for MONTHS and was more or less fine)

I am one of the people the SSM swords were distributed to. I don't use it at all. I just have it. You've failed to attempt talking to me or one of the others about the claims. I know you both and can see where you'd want to avoid contact with Bocc. But why give me the same treatment? You don't like him. Me I'm sure you're more in the hate than the like, but by far more tolerable from past talks recently.

So...to fill you in as to why those edit to the SSM swords were made. There was a few discussions about the blades a long while back in which it was noted that the scroll that the swords were with would be written out and reduxed. Which never happened. There was a vote coinciding with the thread and the popular vote was the current scroll was void and it could be kept as long as they revised it.

A few months back I created a topic about claimed canon items from Naruto. Although no official vote was taken and it was quite low status compared to other topics of that nature. Most people have been following the 60 day inactivity rule. If an item not of your creation is claimed by someone and that person is inactivity for 60 days or more then they lose their claim of said item. I lost "Sword of the Thunder God " due to that same rule that Yomi herself follows. The admin you all are voting for.

The swords that were claimed were done within the boundaries of the 60 day inactivity rule. No one was using them. It took you all long enough to see the claim that was done awhile ago. Point of the matter is that the swords are being held with a scroll that was voted void and furthermore made available to claim due to the 60 day rule.

I'll post links if you want.

Paraphrase reiteration;

Past issues with Bocc on SL problems do NOT indicate if he can manage the Wiki.

Yomi was shortly banned as admin due to having an 'edit war' with Bocc. Removing non-canon items made by characters. He was cleaning up the official list..

The sword scroll was voted as void.

The 60 day inactivity rule was implemented and followed by your own staff pick; Yomi.

The swords were taken by the two first bulletins above this one.