Board Thread:General Discussion (Wiki)/@comment-25567027-20160304224647/@comment-25567027-20160305141159

Keysonx said:

"I am one of the people the SSM swords were distributed to. I don't use it at all. I just have it. You've failed to attempt talking to me or one of the others about the claims. I know you both and can see where you'd want to avoid contact with Bocc. But why give me the same treatment? You don't like him. Me I'm sure you're more in the hate than the like, but by far more tolerable from past talks recently."

I made the edit because NO ONE ever consulted with us or let us know that "hey, there is a topic about the swords being distributed because no one was using them." Way to go as a failure to the community and the people of SL like me being the Kage for Kirigakure not knowing this garbage happened in the first place. My edits are legit and within rights, and we will most likely remove the swords from said claimed list because shouldn't be up there in the first place now.

Keysonx wrote:

"So...to fill you in as to why those edit to the SSM swords were made. There was a few discussions about the blades a long while back in which it was noted that the scroll that the swords were with would be written out and reduxed. Which never happened. There was a vote coinciding with the thread and the popular vote was the current scroll was void and it could be kept as long as they revised it."

Keep talking about that.... You had discussions without us ever knowing and you're only pissing me off more when you talk about this, yet you sited no source of where this happened. Was it PMs? Was it on SL forum? I only see the topic Eric Nara posted because he actually pays attention.



Keysonx wrote: "A few months back I created a topic about claimed canon items from Naruto. Although no official vote was taken and it was quite low status compared to other topics of that nature. Most people have been following the 60 day inactivity rule. If an item not of your creation is claimed by someone and that person is inactivity for 60 days or more then they lose their claim of said item. I lost "Sword of the Thunder God " due to that same rule that Yomi herself follows. The admin you all are voting for."

First, if its not official, then you should have no right to make these decisions. Second, the swords that were illegally stripped from Kiri only furthers the cause of the abuse of power made to the claims list along with Bocch's power hungry threatens to ban people. What kind of a community threatens someone when he doesn't agree with him? I saw Kay's comment about that, and it should be a wake up call for stupidity like this.

Keysonx wrote:

"The swords that were claimed were done within the boundaries of the 60 day inactivity rule. No one was using them. It took you all long enough to see the claim that was done awhile ago. Point of the matter is that the swords are being held with a scroll that was voted void and furthermore made available to claim due to the 60 day rule."

 There is no rule proclaiming this except by what Bocch says, which in term I saw nothing on the Claimed list stating this.